Speaking to Humpbacks in Their Language

Humans have taught other species signals and words for millennia. Some of us have even barked back at a dog, meowed at cat, or mooed at a cow, wondering what–if anything–they understood from our attempt to reach them. Being able to communicate with another species in its own language has always eluded humanity and been a source of quiet discomfort for the SETI field: we can make “contact” with the existence of a signal, but would what we learn be limited?

Putting SETI aside for a moment, imagine the implications of being able to communicate with another species on Earth, especially one so different and clearly intelligent. Could we interfere with them less if we understood their perspective? Could they teach us to improve ocean conservation? What could we learn about human cognition, and intelligence in general, with insights from a second species?

Conversing with a Humpback Whale Named Twain

Twain the Humpback Whale surfacing. ©Jodi Frediani

Only in this context can we begin to understand the magnitude and excitement of this accomplishment. In December of last year, I was in the room with Laurance and most of the SETI Institute’s other scientists. Many of us had given talks about our work, status of our projects, etc. Tons of great ideas and innovative projects. Then Dr. Laurance Doyle rose to give his talk, not just sharing but demonstrating that this breakthrough was forthcoming. Rarely am I in a room with so many distinguished scientists, but I looked around the room as he was walking off stage, and we all had this look on our faces as if we’d all brought our best biplanes to the hangar and Laurance had just pulled up in the shiny new jet plane he made.

On a personal level, I would like to add that I’ve known Laurance for over 20 years. Not only is he the kindest person you could hope to meet, but he’s been studying whales as long as I’ve known him, so this is a result of a huge amount of effort and dedication, which makes sense given the enormity of the task. He’s also one of the smartest people you could hope to meet. He’s not even a biologist actually. He’s a physicist, and one with some of the simplest and most interesting ideas that I’ve ever seen for studying the intersection of relativity and quantum physics, for example.

So, when I say “hats off” to my friend Laurance and his team, I mean the biggest hat to the most deserving person you can imagine!

For more information, I recommend:

You So Crazy, Nature

Even with my general (and limited) understanding of biology, that unless it’s forbidden by the laws of physics, nature generally does anything and everything you can imagine… This one blew my mind.

And not just once, with creatures having eyes on their shells, but with the number of times eyes have evolved within just that genus (remember: domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species), and also the correlation between nerve holes in the shell and eye complexity.

Researchers Solve Mystery of The Sea Creature That Evolved Eyes All Over Its Shell

A chiton (Credit: Jason Edwards/Getty Images)

It’s amazing how something can make total sense while being hard to wrap your brain around it at the same time!

Black Hole Sun

Won’t you come, and wash the rain away? For those in California and around the world laboring under a deluge from the sky, perhaps this video from the frontiers of astroseismology will be entertaining and informative, if not comforting.

“What if there’s a black hole inside the sun? Hawking Stars from PBS Space Time”

The short version is that it’s not implausible for a microscopic black hole to enter the sun, start consuming material and producing back-pressure against the massive gravity. As you can imagine, its growth eventually alters the life cycle of the star, but perhaps more subtly than you’d think.

And, back in the context of SETI and general cosmology, while we’re pretty sure our Sun doesn’t (yet) have one, it is encouraging to think that we can place constraints on the number of primordial black holes there are flying around out there, as well as confirm or rule out some dark matter theories.

A New Puzzle

Some of my favorite moments in science are when we find something that we didn’t think was possible. I also think that’s a good way to describe a SETI experiment: an non-nature detector, sifting through the universe looking for something we don’t think nature does.

Today’s instance is an invisible pulsar companion with a mass much larger than a typical neutron star, perhaps the largest on record, and in the range where it’s expected to collapse into a black hole, essentially at or above the “TOV limit.” I’ll let Science News explain.

An unseen object orbiting a pulsar might be an exceptionally lightweight black hole (illustrated), a very heavy neutron star, or something else entirely. Credit: DANIËLLE FUTSELAAR/ARTSOURCE.NL

For those who enjoy these types of mysteries, I also recommend the so-called OMG Particle in the field of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, which broke the “GZK limit.”

Racing for Life: K2-18b

[TL;DR: exciting astrobiology news at bottom]

One of the things that’s so great about the era of science that we’re living through, is the steady pace of amazing discoveries–almost to the point that they’re predictable. Exoplanets, the Higgs boson, the age of the universe, gravitational waves, and many others were foreseen and experienced regular progress until their ultimate discovery.

These areas of science are foundational to SETI, but I think the connection is deeper. Everything we’ve learned about the universe suggests the possibilities for abiogenesis elsewhere in the universe are endless. But simple life doesn’t build transmitters or starships. And, as essentially a brand new technological civilization on the timescale of our star, galaxy, or universe, our ability to predict how and how often other civilizations might evolve could not be more limited. We have no exobiology, exospychology, or exosociology–only physics and chemistry which are universal by definition.

Hopefully that explains why I’ve said for a while now that I view the search for technosignatures as in a race with astrobiology. I picture it like the children’s story of the race between the tortoise and the hare. Astrobiology is the tortoise, making regular progress but always painful to wait for the next instrument or discovery. It’s not actually slow, it’s really amazingly fast that we get to watch a fascinating science unfold in real-time, but it’s hard to wait for things you’re excited about! SETI, of course, is the hare, the rabbit that makes rapid spurts of progress. Who knows when and how a signal might be found and, reliant on unpredictable private funding, technosignature projects–like LaserSETI!–show up irregularly and take as big a bite out of the problem as they can.

And so that’s the background which makes NASA’s announcement of observations of “habitable zone” exoplanet K2-18b an exciting step for the astrobiology tortoise. Using a technique called transit spectroscopy (see Update at bottom of post), which measures starlight passing through the planet’s atmosphere while it’s between us and its host star, they’ve identified a chemical composition that indicates it’s potentially a water world. And, especially tantalizing, there’s also hints of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) which, on Earth, is only produced by biology. It’s “the most abundant biological sulfur compound emitted to the atmosphere” and so makes a credible candidate for the first biosignature gas we might detect.

Spectrum of Exoplanet K2-18b’s atmosphere, showing molecular composition (credit: NASA et al)

Stay tuned because it’s too early to say if this DMS is a real or just a trick of the noise in the limited data they’ve been able to collect thus far. After all, we can point the telescope wherever we want, but we can’t make the “K2-18 year” to happen any faster to produce more transits!

Would I be disappointed if astrobiology beat SETI to discovering other life in the universe? Absolutely not! The most interesting scientific discovery of my lifetime will be amazing whoever makes it, and it will only hasten the search for technosignatures and answering the other half of the question, “are we alone?”

Update: Here’s a great illustration of transit spectroscopy:

An Atom Lighter than Hydrogen??

One of my favorite aspects of SETI work is the scientific breadth required. While no one can be an expert in everything, every corner of human knowledge has the potential to affect SETI theory or practice.

So while this video does discuss spectroscopy, I hope you’re now in the muod for some mind-bending atomic chemistry that’s admittedly only peripherally related to LaserSETI.

After watching the video, in case you’re wondering: yes, it technically is an isotope of hydrogen since its atomic number is the same. Its nucleon count, however, is zero. If that seems odd, just wait, it gets better. Since there’s a third type of lepton, there’s not one but two hydrogen isotopes of nucleon count zero. 🤯

If your head is hurting by this point, perhaps you should drink a nice, cold glass of dihydrogen monoxide.

LaserSETI @ RFO Speaker Series

Tomorrow night, May 26th, I’ll be kicking off the annual Ferguson Observatory Speaker Series. We’ll start from SETI basics, explain how LaserSETI is designed, and take questions. It’s free, it’s virtual, and they’ll give you your money back if you don’t learn anything!

Historical Transients

When it was announced a couple of years ago, I thought VASCO was a great idea and important work. Today, an article was published “70-Year-Old Astronomy Photos May Be Clues to Alien Visitors“, and despite the accurate but click-bait-sounding title, I’m glad to see they’ve done that work well, with great care and attention to detail. As with any general audience article on science or medicine, I encourage everyone to at least open the original paper to see what else you can glean from it, especially since this is a pre-print and is expected to evolve before publication.

Sample candidate, credit: Villarroel et al

While I’m quite pleased with the quality of both the article and the paper, I’d feel like I was leaving something out if I didn’t say that, based on what I see in the paper, while I agree the linear structure indicates fast-moving objects, I don’t think one can assume that the whole event is captured by a single plate, and thus we’re unable to constrain its angular velocity and therefore altitude. That puts them well within the range of a lot of high-speed and high-altitude experiments being done in southern California at the time, including the infamous Area 51, in Palomar’s neighborhood.

Map showing 10 different military bases near Palomar Observatory, credit: Bing Maps

VASCO has some great ideas of other catalogs to analyze, which I think is the right next step in any case. They’ve shown there’s some interesting events to be explained in our collective archives, and science is always better (and easier) with many data points. I look forward to seeing how this story evolves!